On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:48:08AM +1030, Romana Challans scrawled: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:43 am, Daniel Stone shared thusly: > > Yes, but the overall CAISA attitude still seems to be "we're taking it > > anyway", and nothing you've said disproves it; in fact, it only proves > > it. I think the logo is a huge symbolic ... symbol of national unity; > > god knows nothing else is unified. > > hmm, the test of fair is - if you turn it around, is it still fair? No, it isn't. > you expect us to sit with an old logo noone here really likes - the attitdue > of some in victoria seems to be 'thats the way it is, why change, just deal' > as an example of national untiy, that fails several key tests, imho. The whole is not the one and, as someone who spent a huge amount of time lobbying to have the database project extend nationally instead of just being closeted to CBV, I find it rather insulting that I'm lumped in with the CBV == CAI point of view. I'm not suggesting we don't change. Read what I said again. > but ALL of us choosing a national logo together, all members and volunteers > having equal chance, surely THATS about demonstrating unity? YES! > and a nice, fresh, positive start after a somewhat turbulent year full of > change and upheaval? Choosing a logo won't improve the completely dysfunctional situation. -- Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature