[Computerbank] Re: others have it, why not a Victorian one? (fwd)

["The Moose(tm)" <moose@bovine.artificial-stupidity.net>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 15:54:09 +1000
From: Bruce McCubbery <brucemcc@melbpc.org.au>
To: "The Moose(tm)" <moose@bovine.artificial-stupidity.net>
Subject: Re: others have it, why not a Victorian one?

:-)

Thanks again Pen,

Good to know the sign's costing nothing. I must say I'm uninclined to speak
about VIC-only matters on the list but on the other hand I'd like to hear
more about what's happening at the grassroots in the other states, too.
When they do that I'll feel able to speak up again.

Who reads the minutes? Not me. Surely there's a need for someone to keep
everyone abreast of what's happening?

Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly happy with every that's happened so far
and understand the delays, I'm just on about what can be done by 'others'
outside the normal Computerbank loops. Some will be happiest in the mailing
list environment, not all, but as soon as possible we want it working the
best it can..

Regards, Bruce

At 14:35 15/09/01 +1000, you wrote:

>Most of this info can be found in the minutres which are posted on the
>website  in the minutes repository.
>At the moment Bruce things for vic are really for everyone and it's the
>best way to keep all.



_______________________________________________
computerbank mailing list
computerbank@lists.linux.org.au
http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/computerbank