Re: crimson fields graphics

To: crimson-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: crimson fields graphics
From: Laurent Chea <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:13:25 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:13:09 -0400
In-reply-to: <1156352972l.315l.3l@fizz>
References: <44EB7BC5.3070704@laurentchea.com> <44EBF7B0.9020500@laurentchea.com> <1156348834l.315l.1l@fizz> <44EC8904.9010505@laurentchea.com> <1156352972l.315l.3l@fizz>
Reply-to: crimson-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-crimson-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)

> What exactly is wrong with the set when you load it in crimson? You can
> send me the bmp (best off-list) if you like and I'll take a look.

Where do I send it to you ? Oh by the way, can it be a problem like "it lacks one pixel or there's 1 or 2 pixel that should not exist" ?

References:
- [crimson-users] crimson fields graphics
  - From: Laurent Chea
- Re: [crimson-users] crimson fields graphics
  - From: Laurent Chea
- Re: crimson fields graphics
  - From: Jens Granseuer
- Re: crimson fields graphics
  - From: Laurent Chea
- Re: crimson fields graphics
  - From: Jens Granseuer