Re: [f-cpu] Status quo

[ben <bfranchuk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/28/2015 2:49 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote:

> Well, imho the design and it's implementation is as good as the team
> behind it. The proper question is - are we good enough to make a better
> design than the other teams did :D?

Well today we have I think a better idea where memory is going
in the future and that is a good check of what basic designs
are still valid. Risc I thought was valid when the core alu was
about twice the speed a random access memory cycle, but I have to look
that up.

Ben.

> Kind regards,
> Nikolay
> *************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxx with
> unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/