[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: encore une couche (was: Re: [f-cpu] License issues GPL/LGPL and Juergen Goeritz' SoC)

Hash: SHA1


> > > > If they want to use fcpu, they should release under the GPL code. Great for us !
> > > release what ? the modified source.
> > No the code of the coprocessor.
> what is the difference ?
> if the coprocessor is inside the core, yes, if it is interfaced using the standard
> extensions, i see no problem.

Erm, the GPL forbids linking propritary content with GPL. But this can be
defined in our interpretation in a way linux does.

I suggest, we define a strict interface to f-cpu, which are similiar with
a limes to our GPL-protected f-cpu-design. We should decide between
feature-enhancements inside of f-cpu and feature-enhancements outside. Out
side is a "zu weites Feld", but if we want include sources into the core,
it must be GPL-ized.

> I hope that we will find some help soon. APRIL, GAOS, CCC ?...
> We will discuss about this next time we meet (soon).

Do you meant these?

Bye Andreas
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org


To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/