[freehaven-cvs] Removed superfluous article.

[rabbi@seul.org]

Update of /home2/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/pynchon-gate
In directory moria.mit.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv25472

Modified Files:
	pynchon.tex 
Log Message:
Removed superfluous article.


Index: pynchon.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home2/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/pynchon-gate/pynchon.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -d -r1.9 -r1.10
--- pynchon.tex	27 Jan 2004 02:16:22 -0000	1.9
+++ pynchon.tex	27 Jan 2004 03:12:43 -0000	1.10
@@ -109,21 +109,20 @@
 While the Type II system does not have any means of support for anonymous
 reply blocks, the Type III system introduces single-use reply blocks
 (SURBs)~\cite{surb} as a means of avoiding the replay attack issues.
-Mixminion requires the the recipient to create a large number of reply
-blocks to be used by those who wish to send her mail. In practice, this is
-likely to be automated by a nym server~\cite{pop-mix} which will handle
-the storage of SURBs and transfer of pseudonymous mail through the
-remailer network to the recipient. The technique used in Mixminion also
-has the property that the forward and reply messages share the same
-anonymity set, which is a significant security improvement over Type I.
-However, since reply blocks are still being used, the reliability issues
-remain.\footnote {If any given node in the pre-selected SURB is defunct at
-the time mail is set to be delivered, the mail will be lost.} Reply block
-systems are also susceptible to intersection
-attacks~\cite{disad-free-routes}. A global observer can collect data on
-who is sending and receiving mail, and given enough time and data, will be
-able to reliably determine who is talking to whom via statistical
-correlation~\cite{statistical-disclosure}.
+Mixminion requires the recipient to create a large number of reply blocks
+to be used by those who wish to send her mail. In practice, this is likely
+to be automated by a nym server~\cite{pop-mix} which will handle the
+storage of SURBs and transfer of pseudonymous mail through the remailer
+network to the recipient. The technique used in Mixminion also has the
+property that the forward and reply messages share the same anonymity set,
+which is a significant security improvement over Type I. However, since
+reply blocks are still being used, the reliability issues remain.\footnote
+{If any given node in the pre-selected SURB is defunct at the time mail is
+set to be delivered, the mail will be lost.} Reply block systems are also
+susceptible to intersection attacks~\cite{disad-free-routes}. A global
+observer can collect data on who is sending and receiving mail, and given
+enough time and data, will be able to reliably determine who is talking to
+whom via statistical correlation~\cite{statistical-disclosure}.
 
 
 \subsubsection {Network-level client anonymity.}

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs       in the body. http://freehaven.net/