Re: gEDA-user: Split ground planes and zero ohm jumpers

[Russell Dill <russd@xxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kovacs Levente wrote:
>
>> I think the workaround in gEDA is still a good way to go.
>
> The bogus DRC error potentially masks Âerroneous connections between
> the planes elsewhere.
>
> What, if there was a way to flag a track as "don't look" for connectivity
> check? You'd attach the flag to the segment that bridges the domains.
> That way, the DRC check would still be sensitive to violations at other
> places. Such a DRCignore flag might have more legitimate uses. E.g, the
> outline lines may be be marked like this if vias deliberately hang over
> the edge of the board.
>

Yes, but then if I forgot that track for a given isolated ground
plane, there would be no netlist error. That's why I was thinking more
along the lines of a component that can exist on any layer.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user