[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
From: Mark Rages <markrages@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:31:54 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:32:06 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Bacgf48rtDqL9YBQrfxK9u8b6BxW1eMhVl9ZMe6UEho=; b=OEpS1oshACBtA1pLUYBQKch84YwJIzmcCWgpqkcmk0t4SCyvKdE5RDf6iqei9It6/p oy4+875SilU3Qe3+63sCseABbzy9fn5cMKlqZJs/NsQ1ZluZBhyUT70mWhMq9LSnVvfK XlJGPS1XTotJEdaGGKe9xiqM9pZjzYcyN3f6o=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mf2e144RHd8RXRNgsOK5dn7/KD3PFncNQOv0IaTXKoR5hGafoE7A9O06AqYSzBu3Gk HCw5yXenDCZbWbr5r3V5Yi24yUDFPN0nkZYPp5NSZwtmcHUfHBSEcMrD+4c4wAp0N+6E OGZQ9u1+fJLP2pBjVHPfrLEW+zxMOV+oxdFcw=
In-reply-to: <4C25AA19-77EE-4E9C-BF6F-A1C4DC82C138@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <002501cbf7c5$75091aa0$5f1b4fe0$@de> <20110411215945.GJ5018@localdomain> <1302560719.16212.40.camel@localhost> <4C25AA19-77EE-4E9C-BF6F-A1C4DC82C138@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
>> I would advise a note of caution. In general, I don't like it when tools
>> start special casing things like this.. it just feels wrong.
>
> I've long thought it a minor design flaw that indexed attributes attach the index to the value rather than the name. So, I would prefer net:1=Vcc, while preserving backward compatibility, of course.

Yes, this makes sense.

Regards,
Mark
markrages@gmail
-- 
Mark Rages, Engineer
Midwest Telecine LLC
markrages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References:
- gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
  - From: Markus Traidl
- Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
  - From: Krzysztof KoÅciuszkiewicz
- Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
  - From: Peter Clifton
- Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
  - From: John Doty

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: How to identify a refdes' owner in gSchem
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Power and Port Symbols
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread