[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library

To: geda-user@seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library
From: Charles Lepple <clepple@ghz.cc>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:30:56 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:33:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <20040821020845.8DE2F2AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
References: <20040821020845.8DE2F2AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040805)

Stuart Brorson wrote:

Hmmm . . . . what are the arguments against GFDL? You didn't post a
link. . . .

Here's a proposed position statement:

http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html

but it's not too hard to find a lively GFDL debate on debian-legal with Google.

--
Charles Lepple
clepple@ghz.cc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library
  - From: Stephen Meier <smeier@AlchemyResearch.com>

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library
  - From: sdb@cloud9.net (Stuart Brorson)

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Free Dog meetings at MIT starting this September!
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread