Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Thanks for the link. Regrettably I don't have the time to go into details but looking at the attributes assuming the figure is right, imo, the datastructure is wrong. Otherwise I'd like to get an explanation, why it is clever to link attributesThere is an effort to use doxygen for documentation. See http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:devel-tips Some parts of the source is already thoroughly doxyfied, others still lack this kind of documentation. I don't know about the state of the gschem source.
of unrelated objects. I expect huge amounts of clumsy code and all sorts of bugs and havoc to arise from this. Regards, Armin _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user