On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 00:15 +0400, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:08:08PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > > ???????? ?????? wrote: > > > > > Oh, I am sorry. I just tried to say the links are wrong, that is they > > > don't point to appropriate footprints. > > > > > > > If I didn't introduce new errors, they should be fine now. Thanks again > > for checking! > > > > Any comments on the symbols themselves? > > The symbols are nice, but there are special state standards in Russia > about what should they look like. If you can get hold of a copy of the standard for us to look at, that might be useful. I believe some European countries follow IEC standards for symbols. Shame the IEC standards are so darned expensive and hard to get. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user