[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Re: spice-sdb connection order confusion

Thanks, Stuart!

Works fine with P1, P2, ..., P10. Doesn't like P01, etc., connects them to the net ERROR_INVALID_PIN. Not a problem for me, as I only made one subcircuit like that, just yesterday, and it only took a couple of minutes to fix. ERROR_INVALID_PIN was a whole lot easier to notice than scrambled pins.

An overnight bug fix! Never saw that with a commercial package...

On Dec 27, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote:

John, and geda-users --

I have squished this bug.  The fix is in CVS.  Please download it and
try it out.

Thanks for the bug report.  Let me know if my fix doesn't work
(although I have tested it and it works for me).

Stuart



Stuart,

The ordering of "SUBCKT IO Pin" connections on the .SUBCKT line
apparently depends on *textual* ordering of the refdes attributes.
This gets a bit confusing for more than 9 pins: P10 winds up between
P1 and P2!

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx






John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx