Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 27, 2005, at 8:01 AM, Al Davis wrote:

> On Monday 26 December 2005 10:00 pm, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> > Oh oh.  Sounds like a bug.  I never anticipated more than 9
> > pins, or at least never thought about doing anything more
> > than a stupid string comparison.
> >
> > I'll see about fixing it and sticking the fix into CVS.
> > Thanks for the bug report.
>
>
> > > The ordering of "SUBCKT IO Pin" connections on the .SUBCKT
> > > line apparently depends on *textual* ordering of the refdes
> > > attributes. This gets a bit confusing for more than 9 pins:
> > > P10 winds up between P1 and P2!
> > >
> > > John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> > > jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Why don't you just name them P01, P02, etc.??

Well, that is exactly what I did once I understood the problem. The  
reason to fix this is to make it unnecessary for the next person to  
figure it out...

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx