Re: gEDA-user: Heavy Symbols and such

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Part of the reason I ask this is that as I complete my work on a new
library, netlister et al. I am thinking that beyond having a
hierarchical schematic I would like to have symbols that can have files
such as verilog, vhdl spice etc includded and that if the netleister
could translate a schematic into say verilog and then include embeded
verilof code it would feed streight into a verilof simulator. So this
implies a desire/need for symbols which are used only for simulation
such as signal generators and measurement nodes.

Steve Meier


Steve Meier wrote:
> I am becomming more and more a proponent of heavy symbols or even a data
> base then can generate heavy symbols. One of the really nice things
> about geda is its tollerent or flexible and that heavy symbols could
> easily be implemented. So the question is... is there enough support in
> the geda community to create a heavy symbol library?
>
> Steve Meier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>   



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user