Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As long as its semantics is well enough deffined that I can write a
macro to read and write its file formats then why not?

al davis wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>   
>> al davis <ad151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> Why invent a new language?  Either Verilog-AMS or VHDL-AMS,
>>> the = structural subset, has everything you need.
>>>       
>> I needed something I could implement by myself without any
>> help from the outside world and without any dependencies.  It
>> also needs to run under UNIX Version 7 and cannot depend on
>> anything other than a K&R C compiler plus standard UNIX stuff
>> that came with V7 (such as M4 that everyone hates so much but
>> which I absolutely adore).
>>     
>
> That is why I said "the structural subset".  It meets all of 
> those requirements.  In this case, Verilog is lighter than 
> VHDL.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>   



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user