[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
gEDA-user: Symbol "source" files
- To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: gEDA-user: Symbol "source" files
- From: Matt Ettus <boyscout@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:46:27 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:46:57 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oc+hH2Fn7ls2hdiIVZC6N3Jez1f2p2O5NyJpbV7oySwZsstxTkJjMAvJaZKhVY+DSreDMwjK0Rc0gTGIp1KZg0VimJniMAqNjho5UApHhDwurYUXYj7/AdVznkFoSb1TigehXwkImh9boebQAxA186kEOaieTLwwmr3JOmAbMmk=
- Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
The subject of the gedasymbols repository (which is something I am
excieted about) has brought up an old question in my mind.
Most of the gschem symbols I create are done as "tragesym" source
files. I think it makes more sense to distribute the source files,
since then the user can "build" them for whatever version of geda they
use. if I distribute the sym file, it will use an out of date format.
Thoughts? I think this makes sense, since we already have makefile
support in the geda-symbols distribution.
Matt