[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
From: Werner Hoch <werner.ho@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:53:08 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:53:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <20060202091747.GA23569@kestrel>
References: <20060202091747.GA23569@kestrel>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8

Hi Karel and all,

On Thursday 02 February 2006 10:17, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> I suggest voltage and current controlled voltage and current sources
> to have value (transconductance, voltage gain, current gain,
> transresistance) of 1 if the value is not specified.

I think it is more useful to set a visible default value in gschem.

If nobody complains, I'll change the four gschem symbols that way.

regards
Werner

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
  - From: Werner Hoch
- Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
  - From: Wojciech Kazubski

References:
- gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

Prev by Author: gEDA-user: How to convert a hole
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread