[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
From: Werner Hoch <werner.ho@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:35:57 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:35:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <200602021653.08625.werner.ho@gmx.de>
References: <20060202091747.GA23569@kestrel> <200602021653.08625.werner.ho@gmx.de>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8

On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:53, Werner Hoch wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 10:17, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > I suggest voltage and current controlled voltage and current
> > sources to have value (transconductance, voltage gain, current
> > gain, transresistance) of 1 if the value is not specified.
>
> I think it is more useful to set a visible default value in gschem.
>
> If nobody complains, I'll change the four gschem symbols that way.

Done.

regards
Werner

References:
- gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
  - From: Werner Hoch

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap suggestion
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread