[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:32:25 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:03:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <43FF83E6.2030102@ntlworld.com>
References: <43FF7748.5050003@ntlworld.com> <5477d8e901e8ef682277f8f013af90db@neurotica.com> <43FF79CB.30002@ntlworld.com> <972AD83B-3B8D-4E0B-81BB-545F80737206@wispertel.net> <43FF7C8E.9080304@ntlworld.com> <200602242152.k1OLqgsD014400@envy.delorie.com> <43FF83E6.2030102@ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:08:38PM +0000, Marc Price wrote:
> SMD & Through hole should be seperated for starters

Another great idea - the libraries could have multiple categories
according to which the symbols/footprints would be sorted. For example
for footprints:

vendor
type (connector, transistor, etc.)
SMD or TMD?
author
m4 or newlib?

CL<
> 
> And im having a break now cos im totally pissed off with geda.
> 
> 
> Marc :-\

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Dave McGuire

References:
- gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Marc Price
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Dave McGuire
- gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Marc Price
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: John Doty
- gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Marc Price
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: DJ Delorie
- gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Marc Price

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: POLL: On politeness
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread