[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
From: Marc Price <mark.price13@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:19:05 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:19:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <c9caaef4544f09d53992831a0d18650c@neurotica.com>
References: <43FF7748.5050003@ntlworld.com> <5477d8e901e8ef682277f8f013af90db@neurotica.com> <200602242119.k1OLJbDH013544@envy.delorie.com> <20060225175521.GF26666@kestrel> <20060225204534.9e59893e.levente.kovacs@interware.hu> <c9caaef4544f09d53992831a0d18650c@neurotica.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923)

gEDA has not yet been that productive for me yet! telling me NO PAIN NO GAIN isnt usefull i believe GEDA has potential lots of it but changes must be made, as was stated before my laptop got trashed a few weeks ago that gEDA SHOULD be at the forefront where newbies are concerned and telling a newbie to go use the competitors product is not a good idea.

at current gEDA is not at the forefront.

Hope developers take note of everything that is being said
in these threads and changes made.


Marc :-P

References:
- gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Marc Price
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Dave McGuire
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Leva
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
  - From: Dave McGuire

Prev by Author: gEDA-user: Poll on Politeness
Next by Author: gEDA-user: CC
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread