[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:04:25 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:35:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <200602251712.k1PHC0xg019485@envy.delorie.com>
References: <20060225105533.GA12334@kestrel> <af8966460602250847j332d41c2r9575014033aad1d7@mail.gmail.com> <200602251712.k1PHC0xg019485@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:12:00PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> If we really wanted to rename the symbols, at least follow the correct
> naming convention.  DE-9.sym is wrong; DE9F.sym or DE9M.sym would be
> right.

DE9F and DE9M have the same symbol. Only the footprint differs.

CL<
> 
> But I like backward compatibility and "newbie-proofing" too.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: Charles Lepple
- Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread