[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:12:00 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:12:12 -0500
In-reply-to: <af8966460602250847j332d41c2r9575014033aad1d7@mail.gmail.com> (clepple@gmail.com)
References: <20060225105533.GA12334@kestrel> <af8966460602250847j332d41c2r9575014033aad1d7@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

If we really wanted to rename the symbols, at least follow the correct
naming convention.  DE-9.sym is wrong; DE9F.sym or DE9M.sym would be
right.

But I like backward compatibility and "newbie-proofing" too.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

References:
- gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
  - From: Charles Lepple

Prev by Author: gEDA-user: cs8900a - split symbol?
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: DB9 -> DE9
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread