RE: gEDA-user: Re: LED 100 != 5mm LED ?

["Bert Timmerman" <bert.timmerman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kai-Martin and all,

Checking is OK, and always better than not checking.

Double checking is for if you forgot that you have already checked ;-)

Triple checking is for if you forgot that you have already double checked
...

And I *know* that I'm making errors in my footprints, and sometimes even in
correcting these errors in my footprints.

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.

--

Don't repeat a mistake,

There are so many new ones to make ;-)

--8<-----

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens Kai-Martin Knaak
Verzonden: dinsdag 13 februari 2007 1:58
Aan: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Onderwerp: gEDA-user: Re: LED 100 != 5mm LED ?

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:47:30 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:

> and for some bizarre reason people seem to trust newlib footprints 
> more apparently just because they don't use m4 at runtime.

I trust only footprints I made myself and triple checked for consistency
with the specs. Is this bizarre?

---<(kaimartin)>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
http://lilalaser.de/blog



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user