Re: gEDA-user: Was there a major change to how power nets are handled in netlists?

[Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Matt,

>In many of my schematics, I would have multiple power symbols, and
>when I wanted them to be the same, I just connected them.  However,
>that no longer works!  The netlister is making them separate nets.

	I cannot seem to reproduce this in a simple schematic.  Could
you do me a favor and take a look at the below schematic, netlist it with
your gnetlist (on your machine), and let me know if:

	1) it matches what you are doing in your large schematic 
	2) it netlists correctly or incorrectly for you.

I might not have interpreted your schematics correctly and maybe I am
missing something subtle.

>
>Was this intentional?

	I hope not.

								-Ales

v 20081231 1
C 46000 47600 1 0 0 resistor-1.sym
{
T 46100 47900 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
refdes=R1
}
N 46000 47700 45200 47700 4
N 45200 47700 45200 48700 4
C 45000 48700 1 0 0 generic-power.sym
{
T 45200 48950 5 10 1 1 0 3 1
net=one:1
}
C 44300 48300 1 0 0 generic-power.sym
{
T 44500 48550 5 10 1 1 0 3 1
net=two:1
}
N 44500 48300 44500 48100 4
N 44500 48100 45200 48100 4
C 45400 45800 1 0 0 resistor-1.sym
{
T 45500 46100 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
refdes=R2
}
N 45400 45900 44600 45900 4
N 44600 45900 44600 46900 4
C 44400 46900 1 0 0 generic-power.sym
{
T 44600 47150 5 10 1 1 0 3 1
net=two:1
}
C 43700 46500 1 0 0 generic-power.sym
{
T 43900 46750 5 10 1 1 0 3 1
net=one:1
}
N 43900 46500 43900 46300 4
N 43900 46300 44600 46300 4


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user