[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Open Source mechanical CAD on the horizon

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Open Source mechanical CAD on the horizon
From: Bob Paddock <bob.paddock@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:06:56 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:07:11 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kRyxVwDn2jLkhmsXIyqCVgzKHDN49lSXST60AyJFvRk=; b=BrSOGb7kuIjp/Agxw0LXAOPBHZ6ta1hSruJ7woFzrnyv4tO1mllno/tUlV/vBeBFqo f3xkVxbjHGLcex3/M5678IL7mjiu15QQ/73qDzBAl7sewwtXC2217wKz/hPlTDPg0xPz 3J/QiPDySQZeDR4ZkngPiJcmI6kCQRiVtgi5E=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VWHTh1LMrfaN/Y5JTh6PaSs1Abnqzf8JMXpo3Q79HiUHeyNKiFlOIklVNOTAu9WRRE Yj0ott0L3nEP1qC/8z0A4sMvUnXknFDV85j90fLpliUGUjTjI0TDvlmsZnQpD1JySrxs VXhptYG2jaTDOYYeu8ruvGBpAvA9+WpTEOun4=
In-reply-to: <4B8733AD.2020404@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <hm3fkm$81r$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B8733AD.2020404@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> The problem I hit with BRL-CAD was it had a horribly written build system.
>  It was a shining example of how *not* to use autoconf.  I got so frustrated
> by that I stopped playing around with the tool, but that was 4 or 5 years
> ago and I see there have been releases since then.

They use CMake now.  I was poking around in BRL-CAD today.  They've
made so significant progress.

They still do need a BRL-CAD For Dummies kind of introduction tho,
takes a while just to figure out how to render the demos.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References:
- gEDA-user: Open Source mechanical CAD on the horizon
  - From: Kai-Martin Knaak
- Re: gEDA-user: Open Source mechanical CAD on the horizon
  - From: Dan McMahill

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: any last minute advice prior to sending out for PCB fab
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: gedasymbols.org down
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Open Source mechanical CAD on the horizon
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Open Source mechanical CAD on the horizon
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread