[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: locknames -> ignorenames ?
Hi Kai-Martin,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Kai-Martin Knaak
> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 2:17 PM
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: gEDA-user: locknames -> ignorenames ?
>
> Hi.
> While teaching students howto use geda/pcb, I found myself
> explain that lock-names does not really a "lock" but an
> "ignore" flag. Because, this is how it operates under the
> hood. In addition, the lock meme does not quite fit to the
> behavior. You'd expect locked text to stay in place whatever
> you do. But of course the names of components do move if a
> component is moved.
>
> Proposal: Rename "Lock_Names" to "Ignore_Names"
> (in the menu and in the source)
>
> Any objection?
>
> ---<)kaimartin(>---
> --
> Kai-Martin Knaak
> Email: kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
> http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>
If the "lock" mechanism is not broken, please do not try to fix it ;-)
This is a great opportunity to create all sorts of "Heissenbugs" for not so
often used code paths.
If it's just semantics then please let this issue remain as it is, that is:
in a "locked in place" state.
Kind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user