Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!

[handsome greg <xdissent@xxxxxxxxx>]

why not rename the entire g_key_XXXX to something else (g_keys_XXX
???)  seems more appropriate than just g_key_file_new. if you let me
know which approach and what actual name you would prefer i'll submit
a (unified?) patch tonight.


On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:28:38 -0500, Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >it took a while, but about a million sed scripts later i've
> >successfully compiled gEDA 20041228 against gtk/glib 2.6.0.  isnt
> >someone supposed to fix this in cvs?  i tried it too, but it appears
> >to still be affected.
> >
> 
>         Yeah, contrary to what the release notes said, I haven't had
> an opportunity to fix this yet, mainly because I don't have a gtk+
> 2.6.x installed yet.  If somebody does, and wants to submit a patch for
> this to me, that'll be great.   This fix is just renaming g_key_file_new
> to something else in the noweb sources and of course testing it.  Thanks.
> 
>                                                                 -Ales
> 
> PS. gtk+ 2.6.x is not officially supported by gEDA/gaf 20041228.
> 
>