[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
From: Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:28:38 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:29:03 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:50:06 CST." <98a1521f05011319503da4315@mail.gmail.com> ------
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

>it took a while, but about a million sed scripts later i've
>successfully compiled gEDA 20041228 against gtk/glib 2.6.0.  isnt
>someone supposed to fix this in cvs?  i tried it too, but it appears
>to still be affected.
>

	Yeah, contrary to what the release notes said, I haven't had
an opportunity to fix this yet, mainly because I don't have a gtk+
2.6.x installed yet.  If somebody does, and wants to submit a patch for
this to me, that'll be great.	This fix is just renaming g_key_file_new
to something else in the noweb sources and of course testing it.  Thanks.

								-Ales


PS. gtk+ 2.6.x is not officially supported by gEDA/gaf 20041228.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
  - From: Dan McMahill
- Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
  - From: handsome greg

References:
- gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
  - From: handsome greg

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: gEDA Suite CD - round 2 - eagle sources
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread