[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
From: Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:14:11 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:14:43 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:00:13 CST." <98a1521f0501132100288c4629@mail.gmail.com> ------
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

Hi,

>why not rename the entire g_key_XXXX to something else (g_keys_XXX
>???)  seems more appropriate than just g_key_file_new. if you let me
>know which approach and what actual name you would prefer i'll submit
>a (unified?) patch tonight.
>

	Hmmm, yeah okay, g_keys_XXX would be fine. 

	Diffs generated using:	-Nau (as the parameters to diff) will
work great.  Thanks.

								-Ales

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
  - From: handsome greg

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
  - From: handsome greg

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: phwew! that g_key_file_new snafu SUCKS!
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread