here ya go. patched against top level of geda-gschem-20041228. tested on 2 machines to be golden with gtk/glib 2.6.0 (and i dont see why it would break against 2.x.x). On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:14:11 -0500, Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > >why not rename the entire g_key_XXXX to something else (g_keys_XXX > >???) seems more appropriate than just g_key_file_new. if you let me > >know which approach and what actual name you would prefer i'll submit > >a (unified?) patch tonight. > > > > Hmmm, yeah okay, g_keys_XXX would be fine. > > Diffs generated using: -Nau (as the parameters to diff) will > work great. Thanks. > > -Ales > >
Attachment:
geda-gschem-FIX_G_KEYS.patch
Description: Binary data