[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff
From: Bob Paddock <bpaddock@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:48:02 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:48:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <ad9f782305012519137892be1b@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: The Designer-III Company http://www.designer-iii.com/
References: <ad9f782305012519137892be1b@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2

On Tuesday 25 January 2005 10:13 pm, Matt Ettus wrote:

> We should make this process more scalable.  It should take almost no
> effort for someone to contribute all the footprints which they have
> made to some centralized repository, and simply mark them as
> "unvetted".

David Grant suggested setting up a Wiki for footprint contributions.
I have seen Wiki being used on other SourceForge projects such 
as mingw.  Could one be set up as part of the pcb.sf.net project?
Or someone else have a server they could setup a footprint Wiki?

Is there some reason that footprints can not be submitted as
patches?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff
  - From: Marvin Dickens

References:
- gEDA-user: More footprint stuff
  - From: Matt Ettus

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Manual routing only
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread