[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: RHEL (was: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff)

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RHEL (was: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff)
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:30:58 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:31:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050128122721.D83E12AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net> (sdb@cloud9.net)
References: <20050128122721.D83E12AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> Stuart (who is asking in ignorance about what's acutally on RHEL. . . .)

The whole point of RHEL is that it's guaranteed stable for 5 years or
so, so that customers don't have the issue of upgrade
incompatibilities every few months or end-of-life every year or twoo.
The software is slightly older but much more tested and stable.
Fedora is recommended for people who don't need to pay for that level
of stability and support.

References:
- Re: RHEL (was: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff)
  - From: Stuart Brorson

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: New PCB snapshot
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB pin hole size
Previous by thread: Re: RHEL (was: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff)
Next by thread: Re: RHEL (was: Re: gEDA-user: More footprint stuff)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread