On Saturday 29 January 2005 2:52 am, Karel Kulhavy wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 05:45:14PM -0500, Joshua Boyd wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:42:48PM -0500, Marvin Dickens wrote: > > > I realize that this is probably not going to popular with everybody, > > > but it would be nice if all of the tools that require a gui were built > > > using the same library. Preferably, one that ports really easily. > > > It seems to me that QT is a good choice for this because for the most > > > part, it write once and compile anywhere. > > Qt community edition is said to be unsupported: > "The Qt/X11 Open Source Edition is provided with no support and no > warranty." (http://www.trolltech.com/download/qt/x11.html) They are talking about telephone support. The forums and mailing lists are extremely active. As active as the GTK or gcc forums and mailing lists. > Resolving bugs is a part of support. If they won't (as they claim), as soon > as you hit one, you are screwed. Again, not true. > Cl< This is FUD. If this were true, open source projects written in QT would never survive. KDE is the most obvious example of an open source project written in QT. A more recent example is Scribus, the newest *killer* application for linux. http://www.scribus.org.uk/ Best Marvin
Attachment:
pgpiyA1U3YbxS.pgp
Description: PGP signature