[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: IEC417 + U? errors

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: IEC417 + U? errors
From: "Phil Taylor" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:45:20 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 14:45:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <7A8ACC25-D0E2-4885-90EF-E49B2B5154D2@wispertel.net>
References: <17702B6B8A6ED241BF737ACF8D432DA009A7F0@aplesjustice.dom1.jhuapl.edu> <AF6DC742-08DC-49DB-BC2A-25A1226A1916@wispertel.net> <17702B6B8A6ED241BF737ACF8D432DA009A7F1@aplesjustice.dom1.jhuapl.edu> <17A77AE8-205D-4930-AC11-9DA80E19D44E@wispertel.net> <isqkv2.weidhj@webmail1.hrnoc.net> <7A8ACC25-D0E2-4885-90EF-E49B2B5154D2@wispertel.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But it might make sense to distribute them  
> separately with the warning NOT FOR ACTUAL CIRCUIT DESIGN.
> 

Now you're talking!

Phil

References:
- gEDA-user: gnetlist finding "U?"
  - From: Jose, Marshall
- Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist finding "U?"
  - From: John Doty
- RE: gEDA-user: gnetlist finding "U?"
  - From: Jose, Marshall
- Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist finding "U?"
  - From: John Doty
- gEDA-user: IEC417 + U? errors
  - From: Phil Taylor
- Re: gEDA-user: IEC417 + U? errors
  - From: John Doty

Prev by Author: gEDA-user: IEC417 + U? errors
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB doc on wiki (was RE: Vias with zero clearance in PCB?)
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: IEC417 + U? errors
Next by thread: RE: gEDA-user: gnetlist finding "U?"
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread