Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist l and m options

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul,

Your key word is "opinion" have you been through the code?

Steve Meier


Paul Tan wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks for all the informations you provided.
> Its been really helpful and when I get time, I will
> search for more info on those gEDA topics.
>
> As you all probably know, I am of the opinion
> that gEDA/gaf is in a very good stable foundation,
> to be able to allow us to implement some (for
> now), in the future, most, if not all, the features
> that a commercial EDA tool vendor has to offer.
> I would like to see that a fully Hierarchical Parameterized
> Design features set be implemented in gEDA,
> comparable to some of the commercial advance
> VLSI design tools.
> Thanks again.
>
> Best Regards,
> Paul Tan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:31 pm
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist l and m options
>
>
>
> Paul,
>
> The code Peter is refering to is quite stale by now. It has been my
> intention to finish of a few more tasks and then make my latest code
> available.
>
> These tasks include the completion of making the netlister a schem
> script engine (hence my questions about the l and m command line
> options), Move the writting of schematic files and symbols from the c
> code to schem scripts (the reading of schematics and symbols is
> completed), Publishing a more or less complete scheme interface for the
> library, complete midlevel and backend scripts for supporting
> hierarchical verilog, vhdl and spice.
>
> As I mentioned earlier, I am happy to let others do what they wish with
> this body of work. It is geda based (thus gpl) without a doubt it
> carries geda dna deeply. While I grumble about the state of geda code
> the reality is that the geda developers have captured within their
> code/data structures many important EDA concepts.
>
> If you really wish to see the latest (stale) published version I would
> be happy to give you a link. If you have a little patience I expect to
> be releasing a much more interesting version soon. If you are sharp at
> scheme I am very interested in talking to you about the scheme interface
> and the flow of the scheme script engine that the netlister is becoming.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Meier
>
> Peter Clifton wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 02:06 -0500, Paul Tan wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> My responses are never meant to be political,
>>> I am sorry if they went across to you that way.
>>>
>>> There is nothing political about asking if the
>>> codes change would be disclosed to other gEDA
>>> developers.  Is that too much to ask for?
>>>
>>>       
>> If you search the mailing list archives, you will see various times
>> Steve has posted links to his code. I can't recall the URL off hand, 
>>     
> but
>   
>> it shouldn't be too hard to find.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever.  Check out the new AIM(R) Mail ! - 
> http://webmail.aim.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>   



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user