Re: gEDA-user: gEDA/gaf stable version 1.4.3-20081231 released!

["vsrk sarma" <vsrksiva@xxxxxxxxx>]

   It was not installed after installing libgtk2.0-dev, installation
   completed without errors.
   Thanks a lot.

   On 1/3/09, Tamas Szabo <[1]sza2king@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

     Do you have installed the -dev packages (libgtk2.0-dev)?
     /sza2
     vsrk sarma wrote:
     >    I tried to install on my nx6115 laptop AMD64 loaded with
     Ubuntu 8.10.
     >    It throws up following error:
     >    checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
     >    checking for GTK24... no
     >    configure: error: Cannot find gtk+ 2.4.x or later, please
     install
     >    gtk+.
     >    make: *** [libgeda-1.4.3/config.h] Error 1
     >    Though gtk+ is already present as shown by Synaptic Package
     Manager:
     >    Package: libgtk2.0-0 installed version: 2.14.4-0ubuntu1
     >    Package: gtk2-engines installed version:1:2.16.1-0ubuntu1
     >    Is there any work around?
     >    vsrk sarma
     >
     >    On 1/3/09, Bill Gatliff <[1][2]bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
     >
     >      Stefan:
     >      Stefan Salewski wrote:
     >      > One remark to gschem2pcb:
     >      >
     >      >> stefan@AMD64-X2 ~/gEDA/DAD $ gsch2pcb p1
     >      >>
     >      >> ---------------------------------
     >      >> gEDA/gnetlist pcbpins Backend
     >      >> This backend is EXPERIMENTAL
     >      >> Use at your own risk!
     >      >> ---------------------------------
     >      >>
     >      >> Skipping the m4 processor for pcb footprints
     >      >>
     >      >> ----------------------------------
     >      >> Done processing.  Work performed:
     >      >> No elements to add so not creating b1.new.pcb
     >      >
     >      > I was never really happy with the output when only netlist
     has
     >      changed:
     >      >
     >      >> No elements to add so not creating b1.new.pcb
     >      >
     >      > For me it makes more sense to report what the tool has
     done, i.e.
     >      > generated a new netlist, instead off reporting what was
     not done.
     >      Agreed!
     >      b.g.
     >      --
     >      Bill Gatliff
     >      [2][3]bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     >      _______________________________________________
     >      geda-user mailing list
     >      [3][4]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     >      [4][5]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
     >
     >    --
     >    vsrk sarma
     >
     > References
     >
     >    1. mailto:[6]bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     >    2. mailto:[7]bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     >    3. mailto:[8]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     >    4. [9]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
     >
     >
     >
     >
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
     -----
     >
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > geda-user mailing list
     > [10]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     > [11]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
     _______________________________________________
     geda-user mailing list
     [12]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     [13]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

   --
   vsrk sarma

References

   1. mailto:sza2king@xxxxxxxxxxx
   2. mailto:bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   3. mailto:bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   4. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   5. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
   6. mailto:bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   7. mailto:bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   8. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   9. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
  10. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  11. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
  12. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  13. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user