Re: gEDA-user: [RFC 2/6] Plugin system

[DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> It is my impression that the PCB plugin system is almost the same,
> except that the "well-known function" is used instead of static
> constructors.

I originally did it with constructors, but to do it in C required a
gcc extension.  So I changed it.

> Should plugins use the ".so" extension, (or is that ".dll) which 
> is system dependent, or should they use another extension that 
> is application specific but consistent across systems?

I'd stick with whatever the system defines, so that we aren't trying
to "hide" the file type.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user