On Saturday 17 January 2009 00:10:54 al davis wrote:
> Should plugins use the ".so" extension, (or is that ".dll) which
> is system dependent, or should they use another extension that
> is application specific but consistent across systems?
Everyone is fixating on link-library plugins, but don't forget that there are
potentially lots of other ways of extending libgeda etc.
I expect that, in practice, most plugins will be written in Scheme.
Peter
--
Peter Brett
Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user