Re: gEDA-user: multiple attributes

[al davis <ad252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 17 January 2011, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> al davis <ad252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > How about prefixing simulation attributes with a dot.
> 
> No, please,  use a proper namespace prefix, like 
> 
>   spice- verilog- sim-
>   spice: verilog: sim:
> 
> Backend namespaces, use namespaces, with fallbacks into
> legacy and global namespaces.
> 
>   spice-value=
>   sim-value=
>   value=

If it was just the file, I would agree.  That was my first 
thought.

In this case, that means the schematic itself would be visually 
cluttered with repetitions of the namespace prefix, unless there 
are changes to gschem.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user