Re: gEDA-user: gschem: directly connecting two nets?

[Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John Doty wrote:

> But a little more complicated:
> 
> net1                 net2              net3
> -----------(WP,LP)------------(LP,WP)---------
> 
> Is this "net1" or "net3"?

Or an even more pathological case where nets are fused in 
a circle...

I'd say, take whatever comes first and issue a warning during
netlist. DRC might check for this ambiguity, too. The designer
is responsible to use the netfuse symbols in a way that yields
a non-ambiguous winner.

Anyway, it most likely won't be detrimental to the following tools.
After all, netnames are just that: names. A back-end might need 
fixed net names for special purposes. But since this would be a 
corner case of a corner case, a warning should be ok.

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user