[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: gschem: directly connecting two nets?



On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

> Steven Michalske wrote:
> 
>> We would also need a way to force the chosen name of the net to choose
>> when merging nets.  e.g.  When you merge a net named power with a net
>> named 3v3_power, who wins?
> 
> If a two pin symbol mediates the fusion, this would be determined 
> by the connections to the symbol. The symbol would comprise a win-pin 
> and a loose-pin. The winner would be the net that is connected to the 
> win-pin. 

Works for the simplest case:

net1                 net2
-----------(WP,LP)------------

The combined net would be "net1".

But a little more complicated:

net1                 net2              net3
-----------(WP,LP)------------(LP,WP)---------

Is this "net1" or "net3"?

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user