[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: gschem: directly connecting two nets?
On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Steven Michalske wrote:
>
>> We would also need a way to force the chosen name of the net to choose
>> when merging nets. e.g. When you merge a net named power with a net
>> named 3v3_power, who wins?
>
> If a two pin symbol mediates the fusion, this would be determined
> by the connections to the symbol. The symbol would comprise a win-pin
> and a loose-pin. The winner would be the net that is connected to the
> win-pin.
Works for the simplest case:
net1 net2
-----------(WP,LP)------------
The combined net would be "net1".
But a little more complicated:
net1 net2 net3
-----------(WP,LP)------------(LP,WP)---------
Is this "net1" or "net3"?
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user