[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Pin statement
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:09:14 -0400, Robert Butts wrote:
Will the Pin statement in the footprint definition below give me a
2.1
mm square hole with no copper annulus?
^^^^^^
How would a drill for square holes look like? ;-)
:-P but they are not called drills anymore they are called broaches.
Do I need a clearance and mask?
Yes. Unless you provide a properly cleared mask, the hole will be
covered with mask enamel. The hole might get congested. Some fabs
complain if the diameter of a covered hole is beyond a certain limit.
There is a footprint for an inverted version of the BPW photo diode
in my section of gedasymbols.org:
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/footprints/specific/BPW34S_upsidedown.fp
---<(kaimartin)>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel:
+49-511-762-2895
Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax:
+49-511-762-2211
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-
hannover.de
GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak
+kmk&op=get
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user