Re: gEDA-user: spNet v0.9.2 released

[Anthony Shanks <yamazakir2@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:39 PM, r<nbs.public@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Anthony Shanks<yamazakir2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes I know exactly what you mean now and I have seen (and have used)
>> that kind of hierarchy control present in very high end tools (like
>> cadence)
>
> Sorry, I should have guessed you don't need this kind of explanation.
> Looks like we are coming from similar background.
>

No worries, and yeah it sounds like we do.

>> but it is usually at the schematic capture level like you
>> stated rather at the netlister level. gschem would have to drastically
>> change to support that level of hierarchical maniuplation.
>
> That would be great but I wouldn't expect such change to occur any
> time soon. Even if we prepared a patch it would probably have to be
> maintained separately.
>
> Cheers,
> -r.
>

Don't worry, I'm seriously considering implementing this in spNet. I
planned on looking into how difficult this would be tonight and to
think about what the best way to implement this would be.

>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user