On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, der Mouse wrote: > > To: <geda-user@xxxxxxxx> > > Reply-To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Even emacs can't help but send two copies with headers like this. > > Only if you insist on adding the To: address to the Reply-To: address > when sending. If there's a Reply-To:, it's probably there for good > reason, and it should take specific action to reply to anything not > listed there. It seems a fairly common issue, I wouldn't call it a bug though. FWIW kmail does the same (replies to reply-to and to and they are different). Can the reply to header be adjusted to geda-user@xxxxxxxx? My personal preference is to drop reply-to altogether (so that reply & reply-all do different things like intended). -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user