On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 01:15 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Peter Clifton wrote on the other list where mere users are not allowed to post: > My objection: I use regularily this feature to locate nets. It would be > a regression if it were removed without a replacement. Yes, it is less > than perfect now. A better way to achieve the same goal would be: > > 1) center the canvas on the feature to be warped to > 2) move the cursor right on top of the feature > 3) adjust zoom so that the diameter of the feature is about a tenth of > the canvas. > 4) make the main window of PCB active > > Do all this when explicitely asked for with a click on a warp-button. Try the patch on geda-dev, see how that works as a first cut. > PS: Please let users have a say, when it comes to GUI behavior. > That is, discuss such topics in geda.user, not in geda devel. Alternatively, ask Ales nicely, subscribe to geda-dev and discuss there. There are a huge number of users on _this_ list who don't want to get bogged down in details of an ongoing development discussion. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user