[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:43:45 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:41:45 -0400
In-reply-to: <608bfe54050603113765894fbb@mail.gmail.com> (message from John Luciani on Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:37:58 -0400)
References: <20050603165158.5C5F82AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <608bfe54050603113765894fbb@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> How do you resolve the differences in the naming convention? My
> thought was to attach a manufacturer name suffix.

IPC7351 implies that a manufacturer *prefix* would be appropriate.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
  - From: John Luciani

References:
- gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
  - From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
  - From: John Luciani

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Help with creating schematics that can be netlisted/placed via PCB
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Land pattern naming convention per IPC
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread