Re: gEDA-user: D-BUS and gEDA?

[Dave McGuire <mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 12, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Peter Brett wrote:
> >    "Portable" meaning "runs on different Linux 'distros'", or portable
> > to other OSs and architectures?  If it's truly portable, this is a
> > great step forward for application interoperability.  I need to read 
> > up
> > on this!
>
> If it didn't port to everything Qt ports to, KDE4 wouldn't be built 
> around it.
>
> Including Windows.
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2006-May/004755.html

  Well KDE isn't exactly a shining example of portability, man. ;)  Is 
Qt more portable than KDE?  As in, if I try to compile 
Solaris/UltraSPARC binaries for it with Sun's notoriously (and 
gloriously!) picky compiler, will I end up with libraries, or less 
hair?

  (I've not touched Qt for quite a while)

           -Dave

--
Dave McGuire
Cape Coral, FL

_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user