Re: gEDA-user: IPC 356 (was Re: How's my footprint?)

["L.J.H. Timmerman" <bert.timmerman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Larry, Steve and all,

Googling for information I found some materials describing the IPC356
format.

There seems to be a IPC356 and IPC356A format, the latter having small
changes in formatting.

I found http://www.solidigm.com/downloads/ipc356.pdf which gives a
pretty good description of the test file and the data file.

I'm not in the clear whether this is the IPC356 or IPC356A version; it
states IPC-D-356.

Just my EUR 0.02

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.

On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 19:28 -0700, ldoolitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Friends -
> 
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:08:22AM +0200, L.J.H. Timmerman wrote:
> > Or does a defacto standard format already exist ?
> > Together with a netlist of connecting traces this would give enough
> > information for testing conductity in an automated fashion.
> 
> Does IPC 356 do what you want?  A shop I deal with
> recommends this for their checks.  It lets them both check the
> Gerber itself, and generate user-meaningful reports from the
> flying wire.  I have it on my to-do list, but not very high, and
> I won't be offended if someone else works on it first.
> 
>    - Larry
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user