gEDA-user: Narrow Pads in RESC1608L

[John Luciani <jluciani@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am wondering if the RESC1608L pad length is correct. The difference
between the RESC1608L and CAPC1608L is apx 30%. The difference between
RESC2012L and CAPC2012L is about 10%. I have not looked at heights or
calculated the values using the IPC-7351 equations. The RESC1608L
pads look very narrow (even for least material).

define(`PKG_CAPC1608L', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_MM100(  `$1', `$2', `$3',  90,
65, 120, 200, 120,   0,   0)');
define(`PKG_RESC1608L', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_MM100(  `$1', `$2', `$3',  90,
50, 120, 200, 120,   0,  90)');

define(`PKG_CAPC2012L', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_MM100(  `$1', `$2', `$3', 140,
110, 160, 280, 170,   0,   0)');
define(`PKG_RESC2012L', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_MM100(  `$1', `$2', `$3', 130,
100, 160, 280, 160,  20, 130)');


Also I noticed that in geda.inc (200811xx) PKG_RESC3216M appears twice.
The first occurrence should be PKG_INDC3216M.



(* jcl *)

-- 

You can't create open hardware with closed EDA tools.

http://www.luciani.org


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user