[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: OT: help needed; asymmetric load after rectifier seems to disrupt its working.



Sorry Robert,

Both Wojciech and I are wrong.

His suggestion about adding a choke is basically the same as mine of
using a transformer. The idea of both is to add a dc path to ground at
the rectifier inputs. The difference is that the transformer adds DC
isolation - which if you include your bandpass filter - you do not
need.

Sounds like the thing to do but sadly, the simulations show the reality!

A choke does not do what you want and neither does a simple 1:1 transformer.

However, if you use a 1:1:1 transformer then it all comes together.

You can use a transformer with a 1:2 turns ratio, centre tapped and
keep to the original half wave rectifier scheme. If you use a three
winding transformer of 1:1:1 then you can use two bridge rectifiers.
Using bridge rectifiers doubles the ripple frequency so allows lower
smoothing C for the same ripple voltage.

The attached (not very good quality) pdf shows the non-working choke
and 1:1 transformer ideas and the working 1:1:1 transformer versions.

Note the 1u smoothing capacitor values. These were reduced to make the
simulation reach a steady state sooner than with the original 100uF
values.

         Andy.

signality.co.uk




On 22 June 2011 01:12, Wojciech Kazubski <wk0@xxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would appreciate some expert advice.
>>
>> I have a system which rectifies a sine wave input signal of 20Khz after
>> a LC filter (see Rectifier_sim.jpeg)
>> Everything works fine if LOAD_1 and LOAD_2 are equal. Vx is then
>> (almost) the same as Vin. And Vcc and Vss are equal to the positive or
>> negative part of the sine wave (less the DC losses) (Vss = -Vin_top and
>> Vcc = Vin_top).
>> BUT if LOAD_1 and LOAD_2 are not equal (like in Rectifier_sim.jpeg) it
>> seems that Vx is lifted (DC component added) and Vss moves to the 0V and
>> Vcc is lifted to twice the value I would expect (Vss = 0  and Vcc =
>> Vin_toptop) (see rectifiersmp.eps).
>> Our real life prototype shows the same behaviour as the simulation.
>>
>> I need this set-up for my system to work and I can not guarantee that
>> the two loads always will be equal.
>> Vin can be anything between 10Vtt and 90Vtt.
>>
>> I have tried adding a resistor from Vx to ground and that seems to help
>> but increases the current drawn from the source (V1) to a unacceptable
>> level. It should be a low power solution.
>> If I short-circuit C1 everything works fine again (V1 has a low
>> resistance output) but of course will disable the filter, which we don't
>> what.
>>
>> Is there anyone here who can explain to me how and why this is happening
>> and if available can anyone suggest a solution to me.
>>
>> I have been wrestling with this problem for a couple of days now, so any
>> help will be very much appreciated.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Robert
> There is no DC patch from Vx to ground. If both loads are equal, both
> rectified curreant are equal and cancel one another. If the loads are
> different, the imbalance current charges Vx node until both output currents
> become equal again. To avoid this place a choke between Vx and ground.
>
> Wojciech Kazubski
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>

Attachment: 2bad_rects_n 3good_rects.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user